Posts Tagged ‘realtor market’

Beyond making a mortgage payment

Loans, Taxes | Posted by admin
Sep 07 2009

Most Americans have the majority of their savings tied up in their home. Beyond making a mortgage payment, few savers are able to put away excess income. The government encourages saving in homes. Mortgage interest is tax-deductible. Credit card interest is not. Profit on the sale of a residence is tax-exempt up to $500,000. Government programs support firsttime buyers and lower interest rates for low-income homeowners.

Realtors play up the savings aspect of homeownership. Savers are shown charts of home appreciation and tax savings compared to renters. This leads to overconfidence. Despite government support, a family home is an erratic savings vehicle.

The value of a dollar invested in a family home is not fixed. Home equity can swing up and down. When the local economy is bad, homeowners who lose their jobs often find out that they have lost all the savings in their home as well. In the late 1980s, the oil belt recession forced a massive loss of both jobs and homes. In the early 1990s, New England had a similar episode caused by the collapse of the real estate industry. The massive closing of military bases and defense plants a few years later caused thousands of Southern California residents to lose both jobs and homes. When a
home is worth less than the mortgage, even employed homeowners have lost all their savings.

Competition for Jobs

Uncategorized | Posted by admin
Apr 12 2009

There is strong evidence that decisions of firms to locate, expand, and remain in particular states are heavily influenced by state policies including state and local tax levels. Firms planning to establish new plants or contemplating moves routinely solicit competitive offers from states. There are many examples of firms relocating or deciding to put their new plants in different states because of home-state taxes they consider too high.

Nearly all states respond to these solicitations for offers to draw new plants, often with tax concessions tailored to the soliciting firm. But offering such concessions only to firms considering relocation produces criticisms of state officials for not pursuing even-handed policies. More important, it induces all footloose firms to consider moves if for no other reason than to induce concessions from home states.