If none of these resources will work for you there is one final option. If you have valuables such as jewelry, antiques or stocks that are not a part of your retirement portfolio, and you are willing to part with them in order to fund your invention, you can sell them. We would only recommend this course of action if you have no other. Exhaust all other possibilities before selling off your valuables.
You can see that while there is funding available for Shoestring Budget™ inventors, there is no magic panacea. It is, instead, a common sense approach to creative ways to fund your invention. You can help to make up for limited funds by careful planning and cautious use of your limited resources.
Another potential professional partner is your prototype designer. Again, like the patent attorney and patent agent, this is something that is suggested to prototype designers with some regularity. Unless your invention is that one-in-a-million idea, your prototyper would probably prefer to be paid in money than to bet on the success of your invention.
Almost any professional whose services you will use in the development and marketing of your invention has the possibility of becoming a professional partner. If you choose to pursue this avenue, be cautious not to sign on too many professional partners. This is another area where you could find yourself in the position of becoming a minority investor/owner of your own invention.
Though there are emotional quirks with true saving instruments, the frequency of trauma is low. Saving instruments are for investors who value predictability and are not troubled by jealousy, resentment, or regret when other investments produce spectacular returns and make headlines. Longterm returns on savings instruments are lower than for other investment classes. For those who value peace of mind, the price of lost returns is more than reasonable.
Savings instruments are also good for investors who do not want to spend time on their investments. Buy and ignore is a good philosophy for savers. Someone who needs to be out of the country for five years should leave her money in savings instruments. Blind neglect is often advocated for stocks, but in fact, there are too many five-year periods when stocks lose half their value.
Picking Treasury bonds requires a few hours each year. Higher yields can be found in agency issues and older bonds. Call provisions must be evaluated. The time requirements are minimal.
Investors looking for action should look elsewhere. If you enjoy lots of research, or want to interact with people such as tenants, other investors, or money managers, savings instruments are not for you. While you can create excitement trading bonds, you cannot create profits. High-energy investors should stay clear. Disappointment will follow.
Treasury bonds are also the only insurance against deflation. Savers who worry that current Japanese deflation may be exported to the United States or that there will be a return to deflation of the 1930s will feel safe here. Savers concerned with inflation will be comfortable with TIPs and money market funds.
Michael tinkers with his portfolio obsessively. In prior years, he read investment magazines and newspapers late into the night. Now he has a fast Internet connection and often signs off after midnight. Susan is freaked out by the paper gains and losses that routinely occur every month. The abstract nature of the account statements, reports, newspaper articles, and Web sites makes her nervous. Her mind cannot grasp what they really own nor does she understand why Michael is constantly playing with it. Ever since the decline of 1990, when they were new to the stock market, there has been a sense of impending doom over their financial security.
Interestingly, Michael and Susan would both be happier with a portfolio primarily consisting of single-family homes. Michael’s tinkering could cut costs and improve rents and tenant quality. He has no guilt about being a landlord. He and Susan have a nice house they are proud to own. They are now living in their third home together. Together they were able to buy two cute cottages in attractive neighborhoods, which they sold for much more than the purchase price. Michael is fair with the many employees he supervises.
There is no reason he would be a poor landlord. Michael is also not likely to trade properties. While he is able to justify many small commissions to a discount broker, having never added them all up, the idea of giving 6 percent of his property to a Realtor every time he sells a building does not appeal to him. Susan could drive by and look at their properties any time she needed reassurance. The children could help out cleaning and fixing up between tenants. Though Michael may lose a major topic of conversation at the office, he would sleep better and be more productive at work. He would also be wealthier. If, in each of the last 10 years, he had bought a new single family home with $50,000 down, putting nothing in his 401(k) or anywhere else, he could potentially have equity of $1,000,000 today.
Simple interest is, well, simple. To calculate simple interest, you would multiply your interest rate by the balance that you owe. Any payment you make, in excess of the interest calculated for that period, is applied toward your balance or “principal.”
Let’s look at an example. Bob takes out a simple interest loan of $1,000, at 12% per year. If Bob makes one payment, at the end of the year, $120 in interest ($1,000 multiplied by 12%) will be subtracted from his payment before it is applied to what he actually owes. If he sends in $500, his balance will drop to $620 ($1,000 balance minus $380 applied to principal).
If Bob waits another full year to make a payment, he will owe $74.40 in interest. That’s his $620 balance multiplied by 12%. Whatever payment he makes will have $74.40 subtracted from it for interest, before it is applied to his balance.
That’s it! It’s that simple! Most auto loans, many mortgages, and most personal loans from credit unions use
simple interest. As you’ll see in a moment, these are far more preferable than loans that use compound interest.
Economics is conventionally divided into two types of analysis: microeconomics and macroeconomics. Microeconomics studies how individuals and firms allocate scarce resources, whereas macroeconomics analyses economywide phenomena, resulting from decision-making in all markets. One way to understand the distinction between these two approaches is to consider some generalised examples. Microeconomics is concerned with determining how prices, values and rents emerge and change, and how firms respond. It involves an examination of the effects of new taxes and government incentives, the characteristics of demand, determination of a firm’s profit, and so on. In other words, it tries to understand the economic motives of market participants such as landowners, developers, occupiers and investors. This diverse set of participants is rather fragmented and at times adversarial – but microeconomic analysis works on the basis that we can generalise about the behaviour of these parties. A particular branch of economics known as urban land economics is concerned with the microeconomic implications of scarcity and the allocation of urban property rights. Ball et al. (1998) in the preface to their book state that: ‘The microeconomics of commercial property, proved to be the most difficult [area] to draw together. There simply does not exist an adequate and complete general microeconomic theory of urban property markets.’ This is true and an attempt to develop such a theory is not attempted here! Instead this section brings together and explains the key microeconomic concepts and theories that have a bearing on urban property markets and the important work of authors such as Harvey (1981), Fraser (1993) and Myers (2006) in relating classical economic concepts and theories to urban land and property markets is acknowledged.